Conscientious Objection During World War 1

Was the war necessary? Was it even popular and if popular, for how long? Inherent in these questions is the matter of the war's opponents. Within weeks of the declaration of war, many threw in their lot with the war effort. Many did not
Editorial Board
Related Collections
Collection

Military Intelligence Files: Land, Sea & Air, 1938-1974
Collection

Life under Nazi Rule: Reports by Anti-Fascists in Occupied Europe, 1933-1945
Collection
‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’: Missionaries in Asia during the World Wars, 1914-1946
Collection

Military Tactics and the Rise of Modern Warfare, 1881-1935
(Video)
(Exhibit)
Insights
The minutes from the Union of Democratic Control are unusual in not being official publications. The remaining contents from the UDC are books and pamphlets on secret diplomacy and the war machine.
These two societies resisted war in different ways. As the Union of Democratic Control argued for less backroom deals with foreign powers, the No-conscription Fellowship supported Conscientious Objectors.
The official papers of the 'No-Conscription Fellowship' include their journal The Tribunal, pamphlets, and records of their conference. They also state how the Objectors would be supported after release.
The 'Thomas Ellison scrapbook' includes reports covering both his and others' stories. The branch reports of the 'No-Conscription Fellowship' cover Willesden in London and Hyde in Manchester.
Highlights
No downloads are currently available.